Wednesday, October 1, 2008

User talk:Justinfr

User talk:Justinfr: "

Butterfly -- removal of article link




























































← Previous revision Revision as of 14:33, 1 October 2008
Line 218: Line 218:
:Hi there. I thought that it didn't explain why the article's subject met the [[WP:N|notability requirements]] for inclusion as a wikipedia article, and so it was eligible for deletion under the [[WP:CSD#A7|A7 criteria for speedy deletion]]. I nominated the article, and then an administrator, [[User:Master of Puppets]], agreed and did the actual deleting. If you think the deletion is in error, you could talk to Master of Puppets, or request a review at [[WP:DELREV|deletion review]]. It may be useful to read the article [[WP:WWMPD|Why was my page deleted?]] If you have any other questions, please let me know. [[User:Justinfr|justinfr]] ([[User talk:justinfr|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Justinfr|contribs]]) 23:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
:Hi there. I thought that it didn't explain why the article's subject met the [[WP:N|notability requirements]] for inclusion as a wikipedia article, and so it was eligible for deletion under the [[WP:CSD#A7|A7 criteria for speedy deletion]]. I nominated the article, and then an administrator, [[User:Master of Puppets]], agreed and did the actual deleting. If you think the deletion is in error, you could talk to Master of Puppets, or request a review at [[WP:DELREV|deletion review]]. It may be useful to read the article [[WP:WWMPD|Why was my page deleted?]] If you have any other questions, please let me know. [[User:Justinfr|justinfr]] ([[User talk:justinfr|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Justinfr|contribs]]) 23:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
-

== Butterfly -- removal of article link ==
+

== Butterfly (1982) -- removal of article link ==
-

I posted a link to my review of Butterfly, and you removed it as unnecessary (I happen to think it's well-written, with quite a bit of information that anyone looking up the film on Wikipedia, will find interesting). But the 'Allmovie' link remains, and it doesn't even work (it's disabled). Why is a review from DVDTalk any less worthy than from Allmovie? And why is a review of a film an 'unnecessary' link when I see them linked on many, many other Wikipedia entries?
+

I posted a link to my review of the film Butterfly (1982), and you removed it as unnecessary (I happen to think it's well-written, with quite a bit of information that anyone looking up the film on Wikipedia, will find interesting). But the 'Allmovie' link remains, and it doesn't even work (it's disabled). Why is a review from DVDTalk any less worthy than from Allmovie? And why is a review of a film an 'unnecessary' link when I see them linked on many, many other Wikipedia entries?
"



(Via Wikipedia - Recent changes [en].)

No comments: